Drought is challenging communities in California and much of the West to rethink how they use water. This time, communities are not looking to large, distant reservoirs but to micro-solutions distributed throughout urban landscapes.

California has mandated a 25% reduction in water use in urban areas. Four straight years of drought mean that the public has been asked to change how they think about and use water. The statewide response to Governor Brown’s mandate has been dramatic, with California reducing potable water use by over 27% in the five months since the emergency declaration. Most communities were able to rise to this challenge, and some were able to even save much more as shown in this New York Times interactive graphic. This response was achieved by raising drought awareness and by local communities crafting a response to best meet their unique needs.

San Francisco recently passed an ordinance mandating on-site treatment and water recycling in large new buildings – the first city in the country to take such a step. Now developments more than 250,000 square feet are required to treat water sources such as graywater, rainwater and foundation drainage on-site and reuse it in the building for toilet flushing and irrigation. These on-site water systems reduce potable water use and stretch the city’s drinking water supplies. These small and distributed systems allow buildings to safely reuse water on site, reducing potable water use in residential buildings by up to 25% and in commercial buildings by up to 75%, and increasing the community’s water supply resiliency.

This realization means that new buildings are looked at as a source for water. Water types that can be generated or harvested from a building include graywater, blackwater, rainwater, stormwater and foundation drainage. Water from our showers, washing machines, and bathroom sinks, collectively known as graywater, is the cleanest and most abundant on-site water source. When treated, it provides a consistent non-potable water supply. While non-potable water is not safe for consumption, it can be used for other purposes such as toilet flushing, irrigation, and laundry. Capturing and treating non-potable water more efficiently matches supply and demand and reduces potable water use. San Francisco is mandating this, and it is likely that other communities will evaluate similar solutions to reduce future water use.

The drought and new conservation requirements like this San Francisco ordinance mean that I’m discussing the future of development and water a lot these days. In many circles, people believe that the era of inexpensive and seemingly limitless water is a thing of the past.

Developers across California are looking to future approvals. The big water question is will a business-as-usual approach work? Many developers are finding that the public’s primary opposition is related to water supply. In response, ArchTam is working to develop low-water-footprint communities by using a water balance approach that looks at a site’s water supply and demand (both potable and non-potable) to recommend the most efficient method to manage water on site. This allows developers to best match supply and demand to reduce water use and ensure public support.

Building drought-resilient communities will be a great challenge in coming years. And the one thing that I know for sure is that the conversation is just beginning.

Kerry Rubin is an ecological engineer with ArchTam.

The post Designing cities and buildings for drought resilience appeared first on Blog.

No matter what city you live in, there is a good chance that there is a buried creek right below your feet. Many people do not know that there was once a creek flowing near their home or business. As our cities developed, many of our natural creeks were placed in underground pipes and culverts for reasons that seemed sound in their day—create more developable land, make way for roadways, or even to bury a creek that was considered a health hazard due to poor environmental regulation and water quality. When I purchased my first home, a search over historic maps revealed that a small creek may have flowed near or even under my house. Today many communities are looking at the benefits of uncovering and restoring these forgotten waterways.

Aging infrastructure, flooding, and the desire for more livable cities is motivating communities to explore creek daylighting, which offers a unique opportunity to restore a historic waterway while also revitalizing the surrounding communities. Creek daylighting allows for the removal of undersized or failing pipes and their replacement with a surface channel that provides better flood protection along with additional environmental, social, and economic benefits.

Renderings by Hogan Edelberg and Blake Sanborn.

What this means to the average person is greater natural space in their neighborhood, better flood protection for their homes and businesses, and additional recreational opportunities through walking and biking trails.

Renderings by Hogan Edelberg and Blake Sanborn.

Over my career, I have worked on a number of creek daylighting projects and know that communities undertake these them for a variety of reasons. A recent project located along Lick Run in Cincinnati is designed to reduce over 600 million gallons of combined sewer overflow per year. Re-engineering this historic waterway is estimated to save the city over $200 million dollars by replacing the previously-planned underground storage tunnel. The creek project was determined to be less expensive and provide valuable community revitalization opportunities.

It’s engineering in reverse—instead of building large pipes to carry our creeks, we are building creeks to eliminate the need for large pipes.

I’m currently working on a creek daylighting project in San Francisco along the historic Yosemite Creek. As part of their 20-year, multi-billion dollar Sewer System Improvement Program, the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission is planning to uncover and restore a half-mile of Yosemite Creek. This project will demonstrate that creek daylighting is not only a cost-effective tool to reduce combined sewer discharges to the San Francisco Bay, but can also provide valuable community amenities such as habitat creation, recreation, and education.

Renderings by Hogan Edelberg and Blake Sanborn.

San Francisco’s high-density urban landscape coupled with sky-high property values creates a unique set of challenges for engineers and designers. With a creek collecting stormwater from 110 acres of a local park, the team is relying on streetscape right-of-ways, city-owned parks, and innovative design responses. It will be exciting to see this project unfold in its complex context, and we hope it can serve as a model, along the Cincinnati project, for other cities across the country.

Renderings by Hogan Edelberg and Blake Sanborn.

Kerry Rubin (kerry.rubin@archtam.com) is an ecological engineer in ArchTam’s Design + Planning practice.

The post Once and future creeks appeared first on Blog.