While Jacobs’ book was primarily a critique of 1950s American planning policy, her quote above remains relevant over half a century later.

Around the world, governments, developers and planners are grappling with difficult decisions about how cities should develop. In an age when technology is knocking down barriers to participation and opening up opportunities for collaboration, the best and most progressive cities are those where communities are playing an active role in helping decision-makers make the right decisions.

When you think about it, it’s a no-brainer. Design, planning and development in a city’s context cuts across governance, investment, business and stakeholder buy in, and goes to the heart of a city’s identity. Who better to provide pragmatic, user-driven advice on how cities should develop than those riding our trains and trams on a daily basis, driving or cycling on our roads, playing in our parks and shrugging off the daily frustrations that affect most major cities?

This year, ArchTam has launched two people-powered, city-wide conversations about the future of Melbourne and Sydney. Melbourne NEXT and Sydney Connected both sought ideas and input from residents, visitors and those with links to the two cities on issues ranging from business growth and new industry development to social diversity, transport links and the emergence of city precincts.

Sydney Connected was launched in partnership with the recent Sydney Design Festival. We received over 500 responses to our online survey, and the results – released to industry late last month – paint a picture of a vibrant and diverse population wanting a similarly vibrant and diverse city.

It comes as no surprise that, as Sydney confronts the growing pains associated with population growth that will see it home to more than 6 million people in coming decades, 65 percent of respondents named ‘seamless transport links’ as critical to the city’s future.

The replacement or upgrade of elements of Sydney’s creaking public transport infrastructure has, of course, been a topic of discussion for policy-makers for some time, and no doubt a sore point for frustrated commuters for even longer.

While this insight isn’t anything new, it’s yet another important call to action. Certainly, the potential of integrated multi-modal public transport networks comprising heavy rail, light rail and buses is enormous; the public transport networks of Hong Kong and Berlin demonstrate how effective a well-designed and integrated network can be.

But Sydney Connected demonstrated community expectations not just in terms of public transport, but in terms of where and how Sydney-siders are living, or will live.

Thirty-five percent of respondents think new housing solutions – evident in Sydney’s growing appetite for apartment living – and the development of precincts within and beyond the City of Sydney are critical to the city’s future.

In some ways, such a finding could be seen as the latest nail in the coffin of the great Australian dream of house and land ownership. In others, however, it simply points towards changing tastes and a realisation that, as Sydney’s population grows, vertical communities and apartment developments will offer the 21st century amenities – including transport links – residents and visitors expect.

There are, of course, all sorts of questions surrounding the sustainability of Sydney’s inner-city apartment boom, as well as others of affordability and social cohesion. But we can also see, through  building precincts such as Green Square Town Centre in inner-city Sydney and further west in Parramatta, there is enormous potential for diverse and functional communities that are properly planned, properly linked to transport, and able to cater for diverse and ever-changing needs.

Sydney Connected and Melbourne NEXT have proven valuable opportunities for ArchTam to engage the community around the necessary steps our two major cities need to take to evolve. It’s surprised us all how passionate many responses have been, and we’re hoping from this passion follows momentum for positive change.

If Sydney is going to provide “something for everybody”, as Jacobs said in 1961, there needs to be ongoing opportunities for communities to have their say, to connect with policy-makers and planners, and to feel they’re contributing to the future planning decisions that will ensure the Harbour City remains inclusive, accessible, adaptable, and above all, connected.

 James Rosenwax (james.rosenwax@archtam.com) is managing director, Design + Planning, Australia and New Zealand, ArchTam.

The post People power for a connected Sydney appeared first on Blog.

The Human Scale is as much a cry from the heart as it is a documentary about urban design; when we plan cities, how can we focus on the individual?  The presence of Jan Gehl is felt everywhere throughout the film. He identifies ways in which modern cities repel human interaction, and he makes his appeals through the experience of specific cities (e.g. New York, Christchurch, Dhaka, Siena – all places where Gehl and his practice have worked). Other protagonists – planners from Gehl’s practice, city officials, random people off the street – take up the argument that the planning of cities must relate to human needs for inclusion and intimacy.

Gehl emphasizes the systematic study of human behavior and a principled application of pedestrian-oriented strategies to the public realm. These neo-traditional approaches are still at odds with contemporary planning. In the past, Gehl fought against car-based design, city planning championed by traffic engineers. Now he is also effectively opposed to the dramatic ideological narratives of architectural designers working at very large scales.

Interestingly, The Human Scale remains relatively quiet about the profound transformations due to the increasing globalization of cities. The film also focuses heavily on the physical sensations of the city but is silent about the advent of new virtual worlds enabled by social networking; this is unexplored territory that could provide other opportunities for the creation of more resilient, human-focused environments.

Cities now produce vast amounts of data, and the capability of collecting, processing, and acting on data activated by the people who live, work, and travel through cities. Will this ubiquitous data suggest ways for cities to become more livable, efficient, sustainable, and democratic? Or are these approaches doomed to killing the serendipity that makes cities creative places, or as Richard Sennet said, potentially making cities ‘stupefying’ instead.

In the end, however, there seems to be a clear and emerging understanding of the reciprocal relationship of cities and people. For me, Jane Jacobs said it best: “Cities have the capability of providing something for everybody, only because and only when, they are created by everybody.”

Chris Choa is a principal in ArchTam’s Masterplanning + Urban Design practice.

The post “The Human Scale” appeared first on Blog.

The Human Scale is as much a cry from the heart as it is a documentary about urban design; when we plan cities, how can we focus on the individual?  The presence of Jan Gehl is felt everywhere throughout the film. He identifies ways in which modern cities repel human interaction, and he makes his appeals through the experience of specific cities (e.g. New York, Christchurch, Dhaka, Siena – all places where Gehl and his practice have worked). Other protagonists – planners from Gehl’s practice, city officials, random people off the street – take up the argument that the planning of cities must relate to human needs for inclusion and intimacy.

Gehl emphasizes the systematic study of human behavior and a principled application of pedestrian-oriented strategies to the public realm. These neo-traditional approaches are still at odds with contemporary planning. In the past, Gehl fought against car-based design, city planning championed by traffic engineers. Now he is also effectively opposed to the dramatic ideological narratives of architectural designers working at very large scales.

Interestingly, The Human Scale remains relatively quiet about the profound transformations due to the increasing globalization of cities. The film also focuses heavily on the physical sensations of the city but is silent about the advent of new virtual worlds enabled by social networking; this is unexplored territory that could provide other opportunities for the creation of more resilient, human-focused environments.

Cities now produce vast amounts of data, and the capability of collecting, processing, and acting on data activated by the people who live, work, and travel through cities. Will this ubiquitous data suggest ways for cities to become more livable, efficient, sustainable, and democratic? Or are these approaches doomed to killing the serendipity that makes cities creative places, or as Richard Sennet said, potentially making cities ‘stupefying’ instead.

In the end, however, there seems to be a clear and emerging understanding of the reciprocal relationship of cities and people. For me, Jane Jacobs said it best: “Cities have the capability of providing something for everybody, only because and only when, they are created by everybody.”

Chris Choa is a principal in ArchTam’s Masterplanning + Urban Design practice.

The post “The Human Scale” appeared first on Blog.